OpenVZ — Container Virtualization for Linux
What it is
OpenVZ is one of the earliest Linux container solutions. Long before Docker became a standard, OpenVZ was used by hosting providers to give users isolated Linux environments on a shared kernel. Each container (called a Virtual Private Server, VPS) behaves like a standalone Linux system but shares the host kernel.
How it works
OpenVZ uses a patched Linux kernel with virtualization features (namespaces, cgroups, resource limits). Every container has its own filesystem, processes, users, and network stack, but all share the same kernel version. That’s why OpenVZ is very fast and efficient — no need to boot separate kernels. Management is done with CLI tools (vzctl, vzlist, vzquota). In the successor OpenVZ 7, most of the code was merged with mainstream kernel features, making it closer to modern container runtimes.
Technical profile
Area | Details |
Type | OS-level virtualization |
Kernel | Modified Linux kernel (older OpenVZ), mainstream support in OpenVZ 7 |
Guest OS | Linux only (same kernel ABI) |
Management | CLI (vzctl, vzlist, vzquota) |
Isolation | Namespaces, cgroups, resource limits |
Networking | veth, venet interfaces |
Storage | Per-container quotas, ploop images |
License | Open source (GPL) |
Performance | Very low overhead, near bare-metal |
Installation guide
1. Install an OpenVZ-capable kernel (or OpenVZ 7 with Virtuozzo).
2. Install management tools (vzctl, vzquota).
3. Prepare container templates (Debian, CentOS, Ubuntu).
4. Create a container: vzctl create –ostemplate debian-11-x86_64.
5. Configure networking and resource limits.
6. Start the container and manage via vzctl commands.
Usage scenarios
– VPS hosting providers offering isolated Linux environments.
– High-density workloads where performance and low overhead matter.
– Test labs for Linux-only applications.
– Situations where kernel sharing is acceptable and efficiency is more important than full isolation.
Limitations
– Only Linux guests — no Windows or BSD.
– All containers share the same kernel version — limits flexibility.
– Security isolation weaker than hypervisors (KVM, VMware).
– Ecosystem is smaller now; many users moved to LXC/Docker.
Comparison snapshot
Tool | Strengths | Best fit |
OpenVZ | Very efficient, proven in hosting industry | VPS hosting, dense Linux-only workloads |
LXC | Modern containers, scriptable | CI, dev/test labs |
Docker | OCI images, huge ecosystem | Application packaging, DevOps pipelines |
KVM | Full virtualization, any OS | Mixed workloads, stronger isolation |