Podman — Containers Without the Daemon
What it is
Podman is a container engine designed as a drop-in replacement for Docker, but with a different architecture. The big difference: no central daemon. Each container runs as a regular process, which makes it easier to secure and to integrate with systemd. It follows the OCI (Open Container Initiative) standards, so images and commands look almost the same as Docker’s.
How it works
Podman uses libpod under the hood. Instead of a background service, it forks containers directly under the user session or root. Commands like podman run, podman build, or podman push mirror Docker syntax. It also introduces pods — groups of containers sharing networking and resources, similar to Kubernetes pods. Rootless mode allows users to run containers without admin rights. For orchestration, Podman can generate Kubernetes YAML from running containers and even run a lightweight kube-like system through podman kube play.
Technical profile
Area | Details |
Type | OCI-compliant container engine |
Architecture | Daemonless, process-per-container |
Host OS | Linux (native), macOS/Windows via remote client or VM |
Compatibility | Docker CLI compatible, supports Docker images |
Features | Pods, rootless containers, systemd integration |
Security | Runs containers as user processes, SELinux/AppArmor support |
License | Apache 2.0 (open source) |
Orchestration | Kubernetes YAML generation, podman kube play |
Installation guide
1. Install Podman from distro repositories (Fedora, RHEL, Ubuntu, Debian) or official packages.
2. Verify with podman info.
3. Run a container: podman run -it alpine sh.
4. Create a pod: podman pod create –name testpod.
5. Add containers into the pod with –pod testpod.
6. Export configuration: podman generate kube to create Kubernetes YAML.
Usage scenarios
– Admins who want Docker-like workflow without a root daemon.
– Secure multi-user environments (universities, shared servers).
– Developers building containers and exporting configs directly to Kubernetes.
– Running services under systemd supervision for better lifecycle management.
Limitations
– Smaller ecosystem than Docker; some third-party tools assume Docker socket.
– Desktop UX on macOS/Windows requires extra setup (remote client/VM).
– Some orchestration features are still evolving.
– Transition may need adjustments in CI/CD pipelines.
Comparison snapshot
Tool | Strengths | Best fit |
Podman | Daemonless, rootless, Kubernetes integration | Secure Linux hosts, admins replacing Docker |
Docker | Broad ecosystem, standard in DevOps | Developers, CI/CD pipelines |
containerd | CNCF project, runtime-only | Kubernetes CRI runtime |
CRI-O | Kubernetes-native container runtime | Kubernetes clusters, Red Hat stack |